SN 80. Rank 9 of 32 by emission
OpenRoboto
An open competition on Bittensor for continuously improving robotics models.
In their own words · openroboto.aiSN80 OpenRoboto runs a sheepdog trial for robot brains, where every handler trains a pup from the same litter, the course is unseen until the day, and the champion keeps its place until a dog clearly beats it.
The commodity, explained from zero
The output is a model checkpoint: a saved file of a robot's control brain, the kind downloaded to make a robot arm pick things up when told to in plain English. These are called vision-language-action models because they take in camera images and a text instruction and put out arm movements, as a sheepdog takes in a field and a whistle and puts out a run. The subnet starts from a public base model, the shared litter, and pays people to train a better dog from it. Miners "Fine-tune the official base model" and then "Publish a complete merged checkpoint to Hugging Face and submit on chain."
The strongest robot models today, the front page says, "are built inside a few private labs." Whether anyone will pay for an open one is unstated. No customer is named; the only hint at a buyer is a front-page line about hosting a "policy tournament based on real factory need." The champion's file is public on Hugging Face, so a buyer would pay nothing to download it.
Why it is on Bittensor at all
What the network adds is an open, checkable scoreboard and a purse. Anyone can enter, the course is drawn from randomness no handler can predict, and every score comes with an audit record. Here the comparison breaks: a champion sheepdog goes home with one handler, while here the champion is a file anyone can copy, and the prize is the subnet's token, vesting over 120 days.
How the work gets done
Miners fine-tune the season's base model (LingBot-VLA 2.0 this season), upload the full checkpoint, pay a fee in TAO (0.1 burned for the simulation track, 1.5 transferred for a real-robot track), and announce the submission on chain. Validators run each checkpoint through LIBERO manipulation tasks in a physics simulator, a trial field made of software, with test seeds derived from the block hash plus drand, a public randomness beacon, so they are "unpredictable before submission, frozen after it, and reproducible by anyone." A challenger wins only if its score exceeds the champion's by more than 0.01; a tie fails. Emission, the subnet's share of newly minted TAO, is split 15 percent to the simulation board and 42.5 percent to each of two real-robot tracks on an xArm 6, the trials run on a real field, where 95 percent of the track's pool goes to the single champion.
How you would know it works
The public competitions API at https://api.openroboto.ai/api/v1/competitions lists three active competitions, their fees, and a simulation baseline score of 0.286. The leaderboard at https://www.openroboto.ai/#/benchmark renders only with JavaScript; the index's fetch on 2026-09-09 saw a champion at 0.841.
What is missing
There is no product, price, or API for buyers, and the on-chain contact riccardo@openroboto.ai appears nowhere on the site or in the repositories. The chain's github_repo README calls its own submission flow deprecated and points to a second repository. The site is an empty page without JavaScript. No Discord is set on chain; support is "Open an issue on GitHub."
Go deeper
- Protocol and incentive mechanism document: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openroboto-ai/openroboto-subnet/main/docs/SUBNET_OVERVIEW.md
- Current miner guide, dated 2026-09-02: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openroboto-ai/openroboto-cli/main/docs/MINER_LINGBOT.md
- Live competitions and fees API: https://api.openroboto.ai/api/v1/competitions
Sources for this explainer
- https://www.openroboto.ai/
- https://www.openroboto.ai/#/docs
- https://www.openroboto.ai/#/benchmark
- https://api.openroboto.ai/api/v1/competitions
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openroboto-ai/openroboto-subnet/main/README.md
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openroboto-ai/openroboto-subnet/main/docs/SUBNET_OVERVIE
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openroboto-ai/openroboto-cli/main/README.md
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openroboto-ai/openroboto-cli/main/docs/MINER_LINGBOT.md
Metaphor: a sheepdog trial for robot brains. Every claim is drawn from the evidence set or the subnet's own materials; "(inferred)" marks a conclusion rather than a quote. Corrections.
How we scored it
Four audiences, four questions each, scored on what a first-time reader can find in five minutes. Method in the rubric.
- subnet_name
- OpenRoboto
- github_repo
- github.com
- subnet_contact
- riccardo@openroboto.ai
- subnet_url
- openroboto.ai
- discord
- not set
- description
- An open competition on Bittensor for continuously improving robotics models
- additional
- not set
Stakers and validators●●●●● 3.3
Should I allocate here? · rank 12 of 32 for this audience
Q1What it is●●●●● 3
An open competition on Bittensor for continuously improving robotics models.
matches the chain description word for word, output is open model checkpoints on Hugging Face, no unit, no price
Q2Who it is for●●●●● 3
3 ranked submissions refreshed Sep 10
champion 0.841 dated Sep 09, 48 submissions on the front page, the arena telemetry panel on the same page reads 0 submissions, no customers or revenue
Q3How it resists gaming or fails●●●●● 4
named Protocol and Incentive Mechanism document one click from the README with an Anti-gaming summary, seeds from block hash plus drand, plagiarism check, a red team note on memorization
Q4Identity and documentation●●●●● 3
identity 5 of 7, discord and additional not set, github and url resolve, contact address not on the site, a For Validators page and VALIDATOR.md exist, no staker or tokenomics page
Miners●●●●● 4.0
Can I compete, and what wins? · rank 3 of 32 for this audience
Q1What it is●●●●● 4
Fine-tune the official base model
then "Publish a complete merged checkpoint to Hugging Face and submit on chain" with the required checkpoint layout and a CLI walkthrough
Q2Who it is for●●●●● 4
Linux, an NVIDIA GPU (24 GB VRAM minimum) and a recent driver
plus Python 3.11 and Docker, fee 0.1 TAO burn (sim) or 1.5 TAO transfer (real) from the competitions API, registration cost not stated
Q3How it resists gaming or fails●●●●● 4
challenge rules in prose, a challenger must beat the champion by more than 0.01, top 3 weighted 70 20 10 within a 15 percent simulation share, real tracks pay 95 percent of a pool to the champion
Q4Identity and documentation●●●●● 4
guide updated 2026-09-02 with a what works today table, CLI on PyPI 1.1.0 or newer, cli repo pushed 2026-09-09, the chain github_repo README says its own rt.py flow is deprecated, no GitHub releases
Buyers and enterprises●●●●● 2.0
Can I use this today? · rank 20 of 32 for this audience
Q1What it is●●●●● 3
Pull the base model, fine-tune it, submit the weights on-chain.
outputs are open checkpoints and an Open Data Pool, no product, API or app for buyers
Q2Who it is for●●●●● 1
Host specific policy tournament based on real factory need
is the only mention of a customer, no customer type statement and no pricing anywhere
Q3How it resists gaming or fails●●●●● 2
Open an issue on GitHub, we read everything
is the support path, no status page, SLA or response expectation, no Discord on chain
Q4Identity and documentation●●●●● 2
a read-only public API for competitions, submissions and weights is listed in section 10, the chain contact riccardo@openroboto.ai appears nowhere on the site or in the repos
Newcomers●●●●● 3.8
What is this and why does it matter? · rank 9 of 32 for this audience
Q1What it is●●●●● 4
Pull the base model, fine-tune it, submit the weights on-chain. A model only replaces the base if it scores better.
on the front page under the chain description, fine-tune and on-chain unexplained
Q2Who it is for●●●●● 4
Most of the strongest robot models today are built inside a few private labs. We build them in the open.
openness versus private labs stated on the front page, no cost or coverage comparison
Q3How it resists gaming or fails●●●●● 4
live leaderboard with scores against a 0.286 base, submissions dated Sep 05 to Sep 09 and per row audit links, the telemetry panel above it reads zero, page renders only with JavaScript
Q4Identity and documentation●●●●● 3
subnet_name matches the site, url resolves, description is a noun phrase without a verb, no about page, the docs and roadmap sections are the only learn pages
How this score came to be. Verified means the scorer fetched the page and the words are on it; inferred means concluded from code, absence, or a third party. The link badge is a separate automated check made before publication.
Something wrong? Corrections of fact are applied as they arrive during the window; score disputes are batched at its close. How to file one · GitHub issue · email.