SN 34. Rank 30 of 32 by emission
BitMind
Detectors and generators compete in a dynamic loop: detectors sharpen their ability to spot synthetic media, while generators push to create more convincing fakes.
In their own words · raw.githubusercontent.comSN34 BitMind sells a counterfeit-spotting desk for images, video, and audio, where strangers compete to build the best detector and other strangers are paid to forge better fakes to test it.
The commodity, explained from zero
A deepfake is a picture, clip, or voice made by an AI model and passed off as real. A bank's counterfeit desk looks at a note and says real or fake; BitMind does the same for media. The product is an API, an address a program sends an image to and gets a verdict back, at api.bitmind.ai with a key, plus an upload page, a browser extension, and phone apps.
It has a price because companies act on media they did not make; the front page puts it as: "We verify the authenticity of every data point before your AI acts on it." Pricing has three tiers: free for 100 requests a month, Pro at 100 dollars a month for 10,000 or more, and custom contracts for "Large organizations with bespoke needs, SLAs, and integrations." The docs name consumers, developers, and enterprises as paths, and finance, social media, and government as sectors. No customer is named.
Why it is on Bittensor at all
The claim is adaptation, not cost. A fixed detector goes stale as generators improve; BitMind says it wants "a dynamic, self-evolving service that instantly adapts to new threats", and the subnet is how: detectors come from an open contest, and a second set of miners is paid to make fresh fakes for them to catch. That is where the comparison breaks: a bank's forgers are on staff and their notes never leave the vault, while here the forgers are strangers paid in the subnet's token, and their fakes feed the weekly test set. Nothing is said about cost against a centralized detector.
How the work gets done
Detector miners submit a classifier, a model that takes an image, video, or audio clip and scores it real or synthetic; they do not run servers. Generator miners make synthetic media on demand and earn a base reward for valid output times a multiplier, capped at two, for how often they fool the detectors. Validators, the judges who decide pay, test detectors weekly on fresh real and generated media and score them on accuracy and on how well calibrated their confidence is, combined into one number, sn34_score. Emission, the subnet's share of new tokens, is split 40 percent image, 40 video, 4 audio, and 16 to generators; within each lane the reigning best model takes 85 percent and the two previous champions 10 and 5, and a challenger must beat the king by a 0.01 margin after a 48-hour defending window.
How you would know it works
The detector at bitmind.ai/detect accepts an image or video upload without a stated sign-in; that is the artifact. The front page claims "95% accuracy on real-world deepfakes" with no date, and its usage counters render as zero to a fetcher.
What is missing
On chain the subnet has no URL, no description, and no Discord; a wallet reader has no front door. The chain contact is intern@bitmind.ai while the docs use hello@bitmind.ai. The docs' API Reference link is broken and the full reference sits behind an account. There is no status page despite a 99.9 percent uptime claim. Registration cost and the deregistration policy are not stated.
Go deeper
Sources for this explainer
- https://bitmind.ai
- https://bitmind.ai/detect
- https://bitmind.ai/product/api
- https://docs.bitmind.ai
- https://docs.bitmind.ai/bitmind-overview.md
- https://docs.bitmind.ai/getting-started.md
- https://docs.bitmind.ai/pricing.md
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BitMind-AI/bitmind-subnet/main/README.md
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BitMind-AI/bitmind-subnet/main/docs/Incentive.md
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/BitMind-AI/bitmind-subnet/main/docs/Discriminative-Minin
Metaphor: a counterfeit-spotting desk that pays its own forgers. Every claim is drawn from the evidence set or the subnet's own materials; "(inferred)" marks a conclusion rather than a quote. Corrections.
How we scored it
Four audiences, four questions each, scored on what a first-time reader can find in five minutes. Method in the rubric.
- subnet_name
- BitMind
- github_repo
- github.com
- subnet_contact
- intern@bitmind.ai
- subnet_url
- not set
- discord
- not set
- description
- not set
- additional
- not set
Stakers and validators●●●●● 3.0
Should I allocate here? · rank 18 of 32 for this audience
Q1What it is●●●●● 4
Detectors and generators compete in a dynamic loop: detectors sharpen their ability to spot synthetic media, while generators push to create more convincing fakes.
Output is detection classifiers sold as API requests priced per month, the chain has no description to match
Q2Who it is for●●●●● 2
95% accuracy on real-world deepfakes, sub-second latency, deployed across 100+ countries
undated, the front page counters for weekly detections and monthly active users render as 0+, no named customer on own pages
Q3How it resists gaming or fails●●●●● 4
Incentive.md one click from the README with the sn34_score formula, emission split image 40, video 40, audio 4, generators 16 percent, 85/10/5 king shares, a 0.01 margin and a 48 hour defending window, generators exist to challenge detectors, no failure modes stated
Q4Identity and documentation●●●●● 2
identity 3 of 7, no url, discord, description or additional on chain, github resolves, chain contact intern@bitmind.ai differs from hello@bitmind.ai on the docs, no staker page
Miners●●●●● 3.8
Can I compete, and what wins? · rank 11 of 32 for this audience
Q1What it is●●●●● 4
Miners submit media-provenance classifiers across three modalities: image, video, and audio.
input is media, output is a logit array per modality (3, 4 and 2 classes), gascli push command, sandbox rules, no worked example seen
Q2Who it is for●●●●● 3
Miners do not need to host hardware for inference.
min_compute.yml says miner compute varies by model, registration cost not stated (chain burn 0.5 TAO today), competitiveness stated as an 80 percent entrance exam then a 0.01 margin over the king
Q3How it resists gaming or fails●●●●● 4
scoring in prose with MCC and Brier normalisation exponents, lane and king shares, generator multiplier capped at 2.0, a 48 hour defending window, no worked example numbers, no deregistration policy
Q4Identity and documentation●●●●● 4
Mining, Discriminative, Generative and Installation guides linked from the README, release v5.0.0 dated 2026-09-06, repo pushed 2026-09-09, guides undated
Buyers and enterprises●●●●● 4.3
Can I use this today? · rank 6 of 32 for this audience
Q1What it is●●●●● 5
Authorization: Bearer $BITMIND_API_KEY
with base URL https://api.bitmind.ai and a curl example to /detect-image, a live detector at bitmind.ai/detect, browser extension and mobile apps
Q2Who it is for●●●●● 5
Large organizations with bespoke needs, SLAs, and integrations
for the custom tier, Free $0 for 100 requests a month, Pro $100 a month for 10,000+, customer type named per tier
Q3How it resists gaming or fails●●●●● 4
99.9 percent uptime SLA claimed on the API page with custom SLAs and 24/7 support for enterprise, contact form promises a reply within 24 hours, no status page (status.bitmind.ai does not resolve), front page uptime counter renders 0%
Q4Identity and documentation●●●●● 3
getting started page has endpoints but the API Reference nav link is broken and the full reference sits behind an account at app.bitmind.ai, hello@bitmind.ai on the docs does not match the chain contact intern@bitmind.ai
Newcomers●●●●● 3.0
What is this and why does it matter? · rank 22 of 32 for this audience
Q1What it is●●●●● 3
Welcome to the documentation for BitMind, the AI content detection platform.
plain on the site and docs, the README opens with the GAS mechanism, the chain carries no description at all
Q2Who it is for●●●●● 3
dynamic, self-evolving detection system that adapts to new threats
contrasted with fixed detectors, the difference is adaptation rather than decentralization, no comparison table
Q3How it resists gaming or fails●●●●● 4
live detector that accepts an image or video upload without a stated sign in, 95 percent accuracy claim undated, leaderboard at app.bitmind.ai is JS rendered
Q4Identity and documentation●●●●● 2
subnet_url and description are not set on chain, the site was reached through the repo homepage, subnet_name matches the site, the site has FAQ and contact pages
How this score came to be. Verified means the scorer fetched the page and the words are on it; inferred means concluded from code, absence, or a third party. The link badge is a separate automated check made before publication.
Something wrong? Corrections of fact are applied as they arrive during the window; score disputes are batched at its close. How to file one · GitHub issue · email.