SN 9. Rank 13 of 32 by emission
iota
IOTA is a framework for pretraining large language models across a network of heterogeneous, unreliable, permissionless and token incentivized machines.
In their own words · raw.githubusercontent.comSN9 IOTA builds one large language model on an assembly line whose stations sit in strangers' garages, paying each station for the parts it passes down the line rather than for a finished car.
The commodity, explained from zero
The commodity is training: the process of teaching a language model by pushing text through it and adjusting billions of internal numbers until its guesses improve. The finished product is a checkpoint, a file of those numbers that anyone could load and run. The README calls IOTA "a framework for pretraining large language models across a network of heterogeneous, unreliable, permissionless and token incentivized machines." The current model is a 1.5 billion parameter design, cut into three sections.
IOTA's bet, in the front page's words, is "to show that distributed, heterogenous, permissionless training of models can be a competitive economic alternative to training in a centralised context." The price would be whatever a lab saves by not owning the data center.
Nobody buys the output today. The materials name no customer, no price, and no checkpoint for download. The only offer on the site is on the supply side: a Train at Home app that lets a person with a Linux machine and a GPU plug in and earn. Here the comparison breaks: an assembly line exists to ship cars, and this line has not yet said who will drive the one it is building.
Why it is on Bittensor at all
The claim is that a training run can be paid for continuously, by measured contribution, rather than from one lab's payroll. The July 2025 paper says the earlier design of this subnet had each miner train a whole model alone and "rewards favored hoarding," and that IOTA splits the work so a contributor needs only a slice. Whether that beats a data center on cost is what the project says it is trying to show; no cost figure is given.
How the work gets done
An orchestrator, a coordinating server run by the team, hands each miner one layer of the model and streams activations, the intermediate numbers passed between layers, through a shared storage bucket. Miners "compete to process as many activations as possible," and periodically upload their weights. Validators measure each miner's output for consistency over time, agreement with peers on the same layer, the expected shape of real training, and "tell-tale patterns of repetition or shortcuts that suggest the miner is faking work." A miner's reward is its share of the run's total score, times the run's allocation, times one minus a burn factor, over a rolling window of about a day; the lowest scorers on a layer can be removed each epoch.
How you would know it works
The dashboard at https://iota.macrocosmos.ai/dashboard is live, but every counter read zero on 2026-09-09 while the front page said "Project Orion is Live!" The technical paper at https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.17766, dated July 2025, is the only published result.
What is missing
The README's two documentation links return Page Not Found, so there is no working miner guide. The dashboard reads zero. The chain description, "Bringing liquid training to the world," appears nowhere on the site. Support is Discord only, and the last tagged release is v3.0.0 from 2026-03-09.
Go deeper
- Front door with stated objective: https://iota.macrocosmos.ai/
- Scoring, rewards and kicking page: https://docs.macrocosmos.ai/subnets/subnet-9-iota/scoring-rewards-and-kicking.md
- The technical paper, July 2025: https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.17766
Sources for this explainer
Metaphor: an assembly line whose stations sit in strangers' garages. Every claim is drawn from the evidence set or the subnet's own materials; "(inferred)" marks a conclusion rather than a quote. Corrections.
How we scored it
Four audiences, four questions each, scored on what a first-time reader can find in five minutes. Method in the rubric.
- subnet_name
- iota
- github_repo
- github.com
- subnet_contact
- hello@macrocosmos.ai
- subnet_url
- iota.macrocosmos.ai
- discord
- discord.gg dead
- description
- Bringing liquid training to the world
- additional
- not set
Stakers and validators●●●●● 3.0
Should I allocate here? · rank 18 of 32 for this audience
Q1What it is●●●●● 3
distributed, heterogenous, permissionless training of models can be a competitive economic alternative to training in a centralised context
output is a pretrained LLM, no unit or price
Q2Who it is for●●●●● 2
Loss 0.0000 Tokens 0.00B Active nodes 0 Parameters 0.0B
on the live dashboard while the front page says Project Orion is Live, no customers or revenue
Q3How it resists gaming or fails●●●●● 4
named Scoring, Rewards and Kicking page two clicks from the docs root with consistency, peer agreement and anti-gaming checks, a weight formula and a kick policy, thresholds left to the code
Q4Identity and documentation●●●●● 3
identity 6 of 7, github and url resolve, contact matches the site footer, chain discord invite shows no server name, README docs links 404, delegation guide dated February 2025 calls SN9 Training
Miners●●●●● 2.5
Can I compete, and what wins? · rank 29 of 32 for this audience
Q1What it is●●●●● 2
Miners compete to process as many activations as possible in the training stage.
five README bullets, no input or output shape, the linked miner docs return Page Not Found
Q2Who it is for●●●●● 2
Cuda GPU with >= 16GB VRAM (RTX 4090, for example)
and Ubuntu 22.04, no hardware table, registration cost not stated (chain burn 0.0005 TAO today), no competitiveness statement
Q3How it resists gaming or fails●●●●● 4
scoring in prose, share of run score times run allocation and burn factor, rolling window of about a day, kick policy for the bottom of the pack or below the bar, no example numbers
Q4Identity and documentation●●●●● 2
README says run setup.sh then start_miner.sh and links docs that return not found, last release v3.0.0 dated 2026-03-09, repo pushed 2026-09-08, docs folder holds design notes not a miner guide
Buyers and enterprises●●●●● 1.8
Can I use this today? · rank 23 of 32 for this audience
Q1What it is●●●●● 2
Train at Home By downloading an app, connecting your wallet and starting training
is a supply side app, no product, checkpoint or API for buyers, no statement that there is no product yet
Q2Who it is for●●●●● 1
a competitive economic alternative to training in a centralised context
is the only hint at a buyer, no customer type and no pricing anywhere
Q3How it resists gaming or fails●●●●● 2
please message us in the Bittensor Discord channel for subnet 9, or our own Macrocosmos Discord
no status page, no SLA, Discord is the only support path
Q4Identity and documentation●●●●● 2
the only documented API is the read-only auditor endpoint for compute provisioning decisions, hello@macrocosmos.ai on chain matches the site footer, no product API reference
Newcomers●●●●● 2.8
What is this and why does it matter? · rank 26 of 32 for this audience
Q1What it is●●●●● 3
The core objective of Project Orion is to show that distributed, heterogenous, permissionless training of models can be a competitive economic alternative
front page, jargon unexplained
Q2Who it is for●●●●● 3
a distributed AI ecosystem powered by people, not datacenters
and the front page economic alternative claim, no cost, ownership or coverage comparison with numbers
Q3How it resists gaming or fails●●●●● 2
the dashboard is live but every counter reads zero, results are claimed in an arXiv paper dated July 2025 and substack posts, no dated benchmark on the site
Q4Identity and documentation●●●●● 3
subnet_name iota matches the site title IOTA, url resolves, description Bringing liquid training to the world is a fragment that appears nowhere on the site
How this score came to be. Verified means the scorer fetched the page and the words are on it; inferred means concluded from code, absence, or a third party. The link badge is a separate automated check made before publication.
Something wrong? Corrections of fact are applied as they arrive during the window; score disputes are batched at its close. How to file one · GitHub issue · email.